CERBERUS_DARTBOARD_Selective_Runtime_Resolution_Through_DARTS_v0.1.docx

CERBERUS DARTBOARD Selective Runtime Resolution Through DARTS Display • ARMORY • Routing • Temporal • Semiotic CORE SYSTEM STATEMENT DARTBOARD is the task-bounded runtime surface where the applicable DARTS projections are resolved, bound to governed Targets, and manifested for use without transferring ownership of the underlying state. SHORT FORM Pick the applicable DARTS. Resolve them. Land them on the Board. Route operations home. Figure 1. DARTBOARD runtime thesis. Selective projections become operationally co-present without transferring ownership. Version 0.1 • 24 August 2026 • Verified Release Document Control Control Value Document CERBERUS DARTBOARD - Selective Runtime Resolution Through DARTS Version 0.1 Date 24 August 2026 Status Verified Release Primary role Task-bounded runtime resolution and manifestation surface Projection architecture DARTS - Display, ARMORY, Routing, Temporal, Semiotic Primary runtime unit One bounded DARTBOARD instance / operational surface Figure program 18 approved Figure Contracts; 18 Compound Constructs; 18 publication renders Primary boundary DARTBOARD composes governed projections; it does not become their canonical owner. Executive Summary CERBERUS separates runtime concerns that are often tangled together in ordinary applications. Display makes governed state usable. ARMORY contributes accumulated personal or cybernetic context when it matters. Routing reaches and operates exact registered targets. Temporal answers WHEN through TIME when a task has temporal semantics. Semiotic contributes governed meaning and symbolic context through BOSS. These five projection domains are DARTS. DARTS is not a five-stage pipeline. A Board is complete when it resolves the subset required by the task. A BitWord inspector may require Display, Routing, and Semiotic while ARMORY and Temporal are intentionally N/A. A calendar editor may add Temporal. A memory-aware semantic object may add ARMORY without requiring time. N/A therefore means intentionally not applicable; it is not an unresolved error. DARTBOARD is the meeting surface. It receives task-relevant projections, binds them around governed Targets or compound Anchors, and manifests them through registered Landings. Multiple DARTS may contribute to one visible object: a calendar cell can be a Display manifestation, route to exact TIME machinery, carry Temporal state, and show BOSS meaning at the same time. The surface remains derived. The authoritative systems survive its replacement or destruction. PRIMARY ARCHITECTURAL LAW Independent projections. Shared Targets. Registered Landings. Governed operation. DARTBOARD composes only what the current task requires. Figure 2. Five DARTS domain atlas. Five independent projection domains; no mandatory five-stage pipeline. Section Index Part Section Part 1 Foundation and Selective Resolution Part 2 Governed Targets, Anchors, and Landings Part 3 D - Display Part 4 R - Routing Part 5 A - ARMORY Part 6 T - Temporal Part 7 S - Semiotic and SOLAR Ingress Part 8 Selective Convergence and Runtime Profiles Part 9 SK Reader as a Specialized DARTBOARD Path Part 10 Governed Interaction, Mutation, and Reprojection Part 11 Ownership Boundaries Part 12 Worked Runtime Profiles Part 13 Normative DARTBOARD Laws Part 14 Reconstruction and Implementation Handoff Appendix A Implementation Source Map Appendix B Figure Index Reading Order Parts 1-2 establish DARTBOARD as selective runtime resolution over governed Targets. Parts 3-7 define the five DARTS contributions and their boundaries. Parts 8-10 show how those contributions converge, how the specialized Semantic Kernel runtime fits inside the broader architecture, and how governed interaction returns changes to authoritative owners. Parts 11-14 close the reconstruction contract with ownership boundaries, worked profiles, normative laws, and exact implementation handoff. PART 1 - Foundation and Selective Resolution DARTBOARD is a bounded runtime resolver and manifestation surface, not a sixth truth domain. 1. Purpose and Scope DARTBOARD exists to turn registered CERBERUS structure into a usable runtime surface without duplicating the structures that supplied it. It operates above canonical data and semantic systems and below human-, AI-, controller-, or script-level interaction. The surface may be an editor, inspector, calendar, figure, control array, operational dashboard, learning tool, or other bounded manifestation. The architecture generalizes earlier DARTBOARD work. The existing game/animation Formal Specification remains a specialized operational application, and the SK Runtime Interpretation & Interface Architecture remains the generic Semantic Kernel control substrate. This reconstruction artifact places both inside the wider DARTS convergence model rather than replacing them. 1.1 In Scope DARTS applicability and task-scoped resolution. Governed Targets, simple and compound Anchors, and registered Landings. QUIVER-selected Display through the D/E/F/G coverage grammar. VISOR and BIGFOOT Routing to exact operational structure. Optional ARMORY, Temporal, and Semiotic contributions. Specialized SK Reader routing into generated Display surfaces. Governed mutation, authority checks, commit, refresh, and reprojection. Reconstruction and implementation handoff for the next CERBERUS assistant. 1.2 Out of Scope DARTBOARD does not redefine the internal semantics of BIGFOOT, BOSS, SOLAR, TIME, ARMORY, VISOR, QUIVER, Effects, Skene, Praxis, or specialist Semantic Kernels. DARTBOARD does not infer semantic composition merely from screen adjacency, labels, geometry, or mathematical BitGroup type. DARTBOARD does not grant mutation authority merely because a control is visible or interactive. DARTBOARD does not require all five DARTS to participate in every task. DARTBOARD does not become a canonical copy of the records, meanings, histories, temporal state, or routes it manifests. SCOPE BOUNDARY DARTBOARD is a runtime resolution surface and orchestration boundary. It is not a monolithic Semantic Kernel, truth database, ontology, memory store, calendar, or universal interface schema. 2. The Five DARTS Domains DART Domain Runtime question Contribution Primary architecture D Display What should be manifested? Usable manifestation, interface coverage, effects, controls QUIVER; Display root; D/E/F/G A ARMORY What accumulated context matters? Personal relevance, memory, classification, learned context 0000 / XXXX and wider ARMORY stack R Routing Where is it and how is it reached or operated? Addressing, traversal, Reader descent, mutation path VISOR; BIGFOOT; Readers; Instances T Temporal What WHEN information applies? Coordinates, recurrence, precision, temporal interpretation TIME S Semiotic What does it mean and how is it represented? Symbolic and conceptual context BOSS; SOLAR as lexical ingress The five domains have equal architectural status. They are available dimensions of runtime resolution, not five mandatory stages. A task can legitimately use D/R/S while A and T remain N/A. DARTBOARD must not manufacture a temporal, personal, or semantic contribution simply because that domain exists. 3. DART Applicability and Runtime Profiles Figure 3. Selective DART profile. N/A means unnecessary. UNRESOLVED means required but unavailable. A DARTBOARD instance carries an applicability profile. ACTIVE means a domain applies and its required contribution has resolved. N/A means the domain is intentionally irrelevant to the current task. UNRESOLVED means the domain applies but the required contribution cannot currently be resolved. These states are semantically different and must remain visibly distinguishable. State Meaning Conformance consequence ACTIVE Required and resolved May participate in runtime composition. N/A Intentionally not applicable Board can still be complete. UNRESOLVED Applicable but unavailable or failed Board is incomplete for that required domain; surface should report or constrain the failure. SELECTIVE PARTICIPATION LAW Completeness is determined by task sufficiency, not by the number of active DARTS. 4. Singular DART Figure 4. Anatomy of one DART. DARTS define the domains. A DART is one resolved task-scoped contribution. DARTS names the persistent five-domain architecture. A singular DART is one task-scoped resolved contribution from one of those domains to the current Board. A Routing DART may contain an exact VISOR-to-BIGFOOT path. A Semiotic DART may contain the BOSS Symbol, Family, and explanatory context needed beside a Display. A Temporal DART may contain the minimum TIME member required for the current operation. PART 2 - Governed Targets, Anchors, and Landings The Target is what the Board concerns; the Landing is how that Target is manifested here. 5. Governed Target Every operative manifestation must concern a governed Target. A Target may be a record, NodeKey, registry object, Semantic Symbol, BitWord, Reader placement, BitGroup, Bit, TIME coordinate, or other registered structure. A Target may also be compound when the governed meaning itself is composed from several identities. TIME provides the cleanest compound example. An ordinary temporal day-like position can be derived from Month × Week × Phase rather than stored as a separate independent date identity. DARTBOARD can manifest that compound temporal Target without claiming that the screen cell is the canonical date object. 6. Anchor and Landing Figure 5. Target, Anchor, and Landing. The Target persists. The Landing may change. An Anchor is the governed reference through which several DARTs are known to concern the same Target. A Landing is the registered runtime placement through which a resolved DART contributes to the current manifestation. Target, Anchor, and Landing are therefore related but distinct responsibilities. The distinction permits one Target to appear simultaneously as a calendar cell, timeline marker, text label, schedule card, inspector row, or other projection. Changing the Landing changes usability and geometry. It does not silently change the Target. PROJECTION IDENTITY LAW The Target persists. The Landing may change. Runtime geometry is downstream of governed identity. 7. Multiple DARTS, One Manifestation Figure 6. Multiple DARTS, one manifestation. Independent DARTs may share one governed Target and one runtime manifestation. Several DARTS may converge around one Target and one visible object. A meeting control can receive Display geometry, Routing to the exact target, Temporal coordinate and precision, and Semiotic labels or symbols. ARMORY may additionally contribute relevant history. The human still experiences one coherent object. DART participation does not imply separate screen real estate. Routing can be invisible operational plumbing or a visible engineering trace. Semiotic content may be displayed inside the same control that Display provides. ARMORY may affect context or ranking without receiving a standalone panel. PART 3 - D: Display Display is the manifestation projection. D/E/F/G describes semantic coverage, not physical size. 8. Display Source and Ownership Display begins with QUIVER and the registered Display structures. The Display root and its D/E/F/G tables identify viable manifestation contracts. DARTBOARD does not invent controls from labels or proximity; it resolves registered Display material and lands it on the Board. The Display contribution can carry Interface Elements, declared composites, effects, presentation behavior, feedback, and control affordances. These are presentation contracts over governed state. They remain projections even when stable and reusable. 9. D/E/F/G Semantic Coverage Figure 7. D/E/F/G Display coverage ladder. D/E/F/G measure semantic coverage, not physical screen dimensions. Class Semantic coverage TIME reference example D One viable Bit or Reader-bound placement Week Set B1; Year F1; Fine Tick P1 E Two or more placements composed within one BitWord Month × Week × Phase; Hour + Minute; Offset Value + Offset Presence F One complete BitWord TIME-32, TIME-64, TIME-96, TIME-128 G One complete Compound Start TIME + End TIME; recurring TIME + exception TIME when registered as a Compound Coverage scope is independent of screen dimensions. A large explanatory figure may still be D-level if it addresses one placement; a compact technical control may be F-level if it faithfully exposes the complete BitWord. This prevents interface geometry from becoming a false proxy for semantic scope. 10. QUIVER-to-Display Resolution Figure 8. QUIVER-to-Display resolution. Display is selected and resolved before it is manifested. The Display path begins with task relevance rather than arbitrary widget choice. QUIVER selects the applicable relational material; the Display root resolves the appropriate D/E/F/G contract; registered Interface Elements or composites provide the control surface; effects and feedback may be added; and the resolved manifestation lands on DARTBOARD. NO INTERFACE INFERENCE Visual adjacency, shared labels, or compatible mathematics do not establish an interface contract. Composition and interaction behavior must be registered. 11. Projection, Geometry, and Composite Interaction DARTBOARD geometry is derived from governed semantics. A slider position is not inherently a semantic value; a button is not inherently an operator; a matrix cell is not inherently a date. The binding makes the geometry meaningful. Composite interaction must likewise be declared. Hour and Minute remain separate Reader semantics even when one human clock control operates both. Month, Week, and Phase remain separate temporal semantics even when their combination is projected into a calendar. Display can unify the interaction without collapsing the underlying identities. PART 4 - R: Routing Routing locates and operates exact governed structures and may descend only as far as the task requires. 12. Routing Begins with VISOR Routing answers where the relevant structure is and how runtime operation reaches it. The canonical traversal begins with VISOR structural territory and can descend into BIGFOOT when exact semantic machinery is required. The representative path is VISOR Stack → Registry Table → governed Target → BitWord → Reader → BitGroup → Bit → governed operation. This is a capability ladder, not a requirement that every request reach individual Bits. 13. Routing Descent and Minimum Structural Depth Figure 9. Routing descent. Route only as deep as the operation requires. A lookup that only needs a Registry record can stop at the table or target level. An SK inspector can stop at the BitWord or Reader. A mutation of one encoded field may descend to the BitGroup or exact Bits. Routing should therefore terminate at the minimum structural depth that preserves exact operation and governance. Routing may itself be displayed. Engineering, debugging, and learning surfaces can expose the path from Target through VISOR, BIGFOOT, Reader, BitGroup, and Bits. Ordinary user surfaces may use the same route invisibly. PART 5 - A: ARMORY ARMORY contributes accumulated personal or cybernetic context when that context matters to the task. 14. ARMORY Is Optional Runtime Context ARMORY is not a required component of every Board. It participates when personal history, relevance, learning, reflection, or related accumulated context should influence the runtime surface. When none of that matters, A = N/A is the correct state. For the current reference demonstration, 0000 Memory and XXXX Memory Classification are the strongest implementation examples. The wider 00000 / XXXXX / 000000 / XXXXXX stack remains architecturally applicable, but later tables are still evolving and should not be treated as equally mature merely to fill the Board. 15. Stable Identity with Accumulated Context Figure 10. Optional ARMORY contribution. Accumulated context can alter runtime relevance without altering shared identity. ARMORY grows density around a stable governed Target. A memory or classification may change what is relevant, familiar, urgent, or useful to the current operator without redefining the shared target itself. That separation protects shared ontology from personal evidence while still letting personal context participate in runtime resolution. PART 6 - T: Temporal Temporal participates only when WHEN matters. TIME supplies temporal semantics; DARTBOARD supplies usable projection. 16. Temporal Is Selective Figure 11. Optional Temporal contribution. Temporal participates only when WHEN matters. DARTBOARD is not a temporal architecture. Many complete Boards legitimately have T = N/A. When a task needs temporal coordinate, recurrence, precision, reference basis, or temporal context, the Temporal DART resolves the appropriate TIME semantics and contributes them to the current Board. TIME uses a prefix-preserving resolution ladder: TIME-32 for structural WHEN, TIME-64 for scheduled WHEN, TIME-96 for exact conventional WHEN, and TIME-128 for fine WHEN. DARTBOARD should use the smallest member sufficient for the asserted temporal semantics. 17. TIME 6×6 Calendar as a Projection Specimen Figure 12. TIME 6×6 calendar is a projection. Projection changes usability, not identity. The 6×6 calendar demonstrates DARTBOARD in miniature. Week membership and Phase membership are canonical semantics. Their Cartesian product produces thirty-six ordinary positions. The 6×6 matrix changes geometry for interaction; it does not create thirty-six new stored date identities. This is the general DARTBOARD rule: canonical structure determines meaning; DARTBOARD determines usable manifestation. The same TIME state can therefore appear as a calendar cell, text coordinate, clock, schedule card, timeline marker, or technical Reader view without changing the temporal Target. 18. Intercalary Stress Test Figure 13. Intercalary stress test. The Board adapts to governed semantics; governed semantics do not deform to fit the Board. Intercalary time is the stress test that proves the Board must adapt to semantics rather than forcing semantics into a convenient interface. Intercalary transition positions remain outside ordinary Week/Phase geometry. A compliant Board must preserve that parallel branch instead of pretending every temporal position belongs in the 6×6 grid. PROJECTION LAW The Board adapts to governed semantics; governed semantics do not deform to fit the Board. 19. Temporal Context and External Interpretation TIME may identify reference classes while mutable civil rules or Fine Tick interpretation remain in linked Time Context records. DARTBOARD may manifest an interpreted result, such as a civil-time label, without absorbing ownership of the rules that produced it. This is a general pattern: interpreted state may be displayed while interpretation authority remains external. PART 7 - S: Semiotic and SOLAR Ingress BOSS supplies governed meaning and symbolic context; SOLAR gives language a route into that registered territory. 20. Semiotic Origin: BOSS Semiotic contributes the symbolic and conceptual material needed for a Target to be intelligible in context. BOSS can supply Semantic Symbol, Unique Form, Family, Community, World, description, and related contextual relationships. Meaning, glyph, screen placement, and runtime state remain separable even when DARTBOARD renders them together. 21. SOLAR Is Lexical Ingress, Not a Sixth DART Figure 14. Semiotic resolution and SOLAR ingress. SOLAR provides lexical ingress; BOSS provides governed Semiotic resolution. Natural language can enter through SOLAR. A phrase such as “third week” may resolve to the governed Week ≡ identity when context supports that depth. BOSS then supplies the governed Semiotic material for that Target. SOLAR therefore helps find the target; it does not become an additional DARTS projection domain or replace the target’s semantic identity. Semiotic frequently appears alongside Display. A control can show the registered symbol, name, and semantic explanation without requiring a separate “Semiotic panel.” This is another example of DART participation being independent from screen real estate. PART 8 - Selective Convergence and Runtime Profiles DARTBOARD composes an applicable subset, not a mandatory five-way intersection. 22. Selective Convergence The runtime relationship is best expressed as a selected set rather than D ∩ A ∩ R ∩ T ∩ S. Each Board resolves the domains required by the current task, binds their contributions around governed Targets, and lands them into one coherent runtime surface. The five-domain architecture therefore acts as a runtime capability profile. The profile helps explain which concerns are present, which are intentionally absent, and which failed to resolve. It also gives implementation and debugging surfaces a compact way to state what a Board is actually using. 23. Four Valid Profiles Figure 15. Four valid DART profiles. Completeness is determined by task sufficiency, not the number of active DARTS. Profile D A R T S Purpose SK Reader / Effects ACTIVE N/A ACTIVE N/A ACTIVE Interface + exact routing + meaning; no personal or temporal requirement. TIME Calendar ACTIVE N/A ACTIVE ACTIVE ACTIVE Calendar manifestation over temporal structure with exact routing and symbolic context. ARMORY-Aware Object ACTIVE ACTIVE ACTIVE N/A ACTIVE Shared semantic object enriched by personal context without requiring WHEN. Full DARTS Runtime ACTIVE ACTIVE ACTIVE ACTIVE ACTIVE All five dimensions are relevant; this is valid but not the default. COMPLETENESS RULE A full five-DART profile is not “more correct” than a three-DART profile. The correct profile is the smallest complete set for the task. PART 9 - SK Reader as a Specialized DARTBOARD Path The existing Semantic Kernel runtime is a specialized Routing-to-Display mechanism inside the broader Board. 24. Specialized R → D Path Figure 16. SK Reader as a specialized DARTBOARD path. The SK Reader is one specialized runtime path through DARTBOARD, not DARTBOARD itself. The earlier DARTBOARD SK Runtime Interpretation & Interface Architecture remains valid. A registered BitWord exposes ordered placements; the Reader resolves BitGroups and formulas; DARTBOARD renders the appropriate D/E/F/G controls; and interaction changes governed encoded state through authorized paths. The important reconstruction correction is scope: this is one specialized Routing → Display path, not the whole DARTBOARD architecture. The same Board may add Semiotic material from BOSS, Temporal information from TIME, or ARMORY context around the Reader surface. Conversely, a Board may contain no Semantic Kernel editor at all. The specialized runtime substrate is therefore reusable without becoming universal ownership. 25. Generated Controls and Semantic Preservation A generated control is a projection over registered semantics. Its geometry, color, label, symbol, or interaction style may evolve while the same BitGroup identity and Reader semantics remain stable. Visibility does not grant authority; interface-only state must not become a hidden second truth store. SURFACE INHERITANCE Read the Word. Render the Groups. Operate through the Board. The generated interface remains a projection over registered state. PART 10 - Governed Interaction, Mutation, and Reprojection DARTBOARD directs interaction; authoritative owners validate and commit state. 26. Visibility Is Not Authority A visible or manipulable control does not automatically have permission to mutate the Target it represents. DARTBOARD must respect source ownership, action contracts, permissions, Rules, Operators, and scoped Instances. Mutation authority is resolved separately from presentation. 27. Governed Mutation Loop Figure 17. Governed mutation and reprojection loop. Operate through the owner; then reproject the result. Runtime interaction follows a closed governance loop. Authoritative state is resolved through QUIVER and the applicable DARTS. DARTBOARD manifests the result. Human, AI, controller, or script input invokes an explicit action contract. Routing reaches the authoritative owner, which validates and commits the change. DARTBOARD then refreshes or reprojects from the updated state. The prohibited shortcut is for a local interface copy to silently become truth. Derived surface state can exist for interaction, but a committed semantic change must be written through the proper owner with provenance and validation. 28. Refresh, Reprojection, and Staleness Because a Board is derived, it must respond when relevant authoritative state changes. A stale manifestation should be refreshed, invalidated, or visibly marked stale rather than continuing to look canonical. Reprojection is therefore part of the lifecycle, not merely a cosmetic redraw. MUTATION LAW Operate through the owner; then reproject the result. PART 11 - Ownership Boundaries DARTBOARD owns runtime composition; source systems retain canonical authority. 29. What DARTBOARD Owns The task-bounded runtime composition and current Board manifestation. The resolved applicability profile for the current Board. Runtime Landing relationships and the co-presence of applicable projections. The interaction surface and projection lifecycle needed to keep that manifestation usable. The exposure of registered action/routing contracts to the runtime surface. Derived Board-local state necessary for presentation, provided it remains distinguishable from canonical truth. 30. What DARTBOARD Does Not Own BIGFOOT Bit, BitGroup, BitWord, Reader, or structural semantic identity. BOSS semantic or symbolic identity. SOLAR lexical identity or alias truth. TIME canonical temporal state or Time Context authority. ARMORY source memories, classifications, reflections, or persona evidence. VISOR registry/table structural truth. QUIVER relationship authority. Effects, Skene, Praxis, or specialist system internals. Mutation authority merely because a control is visible. Copies of canonical records masquerading as independent runtime truth. 31. Complete Ownership Map Figure 18. Complete DARTBOARD ownership map. DARTBOARD makes independent CERBERUS projections usable together while their owners remain independent. The ownership map is the final reconstruction view. QUIVER supplies task-relevant relational selection, ARMORY supplies optional accumulated context, VISOR and BIGFOOT supply Routing, TIME supplies Temporal semantics, BOSS supplies Semiotic meaning, and SOLAR provides lexical ingress outside the DARTS set. DARTBOARD composes only their applicable runtime projections and routes mutating operations back to the systems that own state. SOURCE PERSISTENCE Destroy or replace the DARTBOARD surface and the underlying registered systems remain. Rebuild the surface from those sources. PART 12 - Worked Runtime Profiles The same five-domain grammar describes very different surfaces without making them use identical content. 32. Example A - SK Reader / Effects Surface Profile: D ACTIVE / A N/A / R ACTIVE / T N/A / S ACTIVE. QUIVER selects the appropriate D/E/F/G Interface Elements and effects. Routing exposes the path into the relevant BitWord, Reader, BitGroup, or Bits. Semiotic meaning from BOSS can be displayed alongside the control. No personal history or WHEN semantics are required, so ARMORY and Temporal remain explicitly N/A. 33. Example B - TIME 6×6 Calendar Profile: D ACTIVE / A N/A / R ACTIVE / T ACTIVE / S ACTIVE. Display provides the 6×6 calendar manifestation. Routing reaches the relevant TIME BitWord and Reader roles. Temporal contributes Month, Week, Phase, Year, clock, precision, and context as required. Semiotic contributes the governed Week and Phase symbols and explanatory meaning. ARMORY remains N/A unless personal history or relevance is intentionally added. 34. Example C - ARMORY-Aware Semantic Object Profile: D ACTIVE / A ACTIVE / R ACTIVE / T N/A / S ACTIVE. The Board manifests a shared governed target, routes to its exact structure, and displays BOSS meaning. ARMORY adds Memory or Classification context that changes personal relevance without redefining the shared object. No temporal assertion is manufactured merely because historical records could exist. 35. Example D - Full DARTS Runtime Profile: D ACTIVE / A ACTIVE / R ACTIVE / T ACTIVE / S ACTIVE. All five domains may legitimately participate when the task needs interface manifestation, personal context, exact routing, temporal semantics, and symbolic meaning at once. This is the maximal profile, not the canonical default. PART 13 - Normative DARTBOARD Laws The laws below are the reconstruction contract for a conforming implementation or assistant mental model. 36. Inherited DARTS Laws DARTBOARD inherits five global DARTS principles: projection independence, selective participation, authority preservation, surface convergence, and source persistence. These establish that projections may evolve independently, only relevant domains participate, convergence does not transfer authority, relevant projections may share one usable surface, and the surface can be replaced without destroying its sources. 37. DARTBOARD Laws ID Law Normative statement DB-R01 Selective DARTS Law A DARTBOARD runtime SHALL resolve only the DARTS domains applicable to the current task. DB-R02 N/A Distinction Law A non-applicable DART SHALL NOT be treated as unresolved or missing. DB-R03 Ownership Preservation Law Projection onto DARTBOARD SHALL NOT transfer canonical ownership from the source system. DB-R04 Governed Target Law Every operative manifestation SHALL resolve to a governed Target or compound Target. DB-R05 Landing Distinction Law Runtime placement SHALL remain distinct from the Target it manifests. DB-R06 Explicit Composition Law Visual adjacency, shared geometry, or label proximity SHALL NOT establish semantic composition. DB-R07 Display Coverage Law D/E/F/G SHALL describe semantic coverage rather than physical screen dimensions. DB-R08 Projection Identity Law Interface geometry SHALL NOT be treated as canonical semantic identity. DB-R09 DART Co-Presence Law Multiple DARTS MAY contribute to one runtime manifestation when they resolve to the same governed Target. DB-R10 Visibility Authority Law Visibility or manipulability of a runtime control SHALL NOT independently grant mutation authority. DB-R11 Routed Mutation Law State-changing operations SHALL return through governed Routing to the authoritative owner. DB-R12 Semantic Preservation Law DARTBOARD SHALL preserve distinctions established by authoritative source semantics. DB-R13 External Interpretation Law Interpreted results MAY be manifested without transferring ownership of the external interpretation authority. DB-R14 Minimum Resolution Law Runtime resolution SHOULD stop at the minimum sufficient structural and semantic depth required by the task. DB-R15 Refresh Law Derived runtime projections SHALL be refreshed, invalidated, or identified as stale when relevant authoritative state changes. DB-R16 Participation / Visibility Separation A DART MAY participate operationally without receiving a distinct visible manifestation. DB-R17 Lexical Ingress Separation SOLAR lexical routing MAY resolve a Target but SHALL NOT become a substitute for that Target’s semantic identity. 38. Conformance Failure Patterns Failure Why it is non-conforming All five DARTS required on every Board Violates selective participation and treats N/A as an error. Calendar cell treated as the canonical TIME identity Collapses runtime geometry into temporal truth. BOSS symbol or SOLAR alias used as routing identity by string match alone Collapses Semiotic or lexical projection into canonical identity. Visible control writes directly to an ungoverned local copy Breaks ownership and routed mutation. ARMORY memory changes the shared semantic definition Collapses personal context into shared ontology. UI adjacency creates an undeclared composite Violates explicit composition. Intercalary time forced into the ordinary 6×6 grid Deforms source semantics to fit Display geometry. PART 14 - Reconstruction and Implementation Handoff A fresh assistant should be able to reconstruct DARTBOARD from the five DARTS, their source boundaries, and the governed runtime loop. 39. Reconstruction Sequence 1. Learn the five DARTS and their independent ownership boundaries. 2. Learn that DARTS is not a five-stage pipeline. 3. Learn ACTIVE / N/A / UNRESOLVED and treat N/A as a valid complete state. 4. Learn singular DART as a task-scoped resolved contribution. 5. Learn governed Target, Anchor, and Landing; Target ≠ Landing. 6. Learn D/E/F/G as Display semantic coverage. 7. Learn Routing from VISOR into BIGFOOT/Readers only as deep as required. 8. Learn ARMORY as optional accumulated context. 9. Learn TIME as optional WHEN resolution and the 6×6 calendar as a projection. 10. Learn BOSS as Semiotic resolution and SOLAR as lexical ingress outside DARTS. 11. Learn multi-DART convergence around one Target. 12. Learn visibility ≠ authority and route mutations back to the owning system. 13. Learn refresh/reprojection after canonical change. 14. Learn that the Board is derived and replaceable while its sources persist. 40. Reconstruction Tests Prompt / situation Expected reconstruction BitWord editor with semantic labels; no personal or temporal context D ACTIVE / A N/A / R ACTIVE / T N/A / S ACTIVE. User changes a governed value on the Board Action contract → Routing → authoritative owner validates and commits → Board reprojects. Same TIME coordinate shown as calendar, text, and timeline One Target; several Landings. Manifestation changes; identity does not. A required TIME reference cannot resolve T = UNRESOLVED, not N/A. Phrase “third week” enters from language SOLAR may route to Week ≡; BOSS supplies Semiotic context; SOLAR is not a sixth DART. Board is deleted or replaced Canonical source systems remain and can rebuild the surface. 41. Implementation Handoff The current Airtable implementation already separates the DARTS source surfaces. Display is represented through the Display root and D/E/F/G tables. ARMORY demonstrations should use 0000 and XXXX while the later ARMORY tables continue to evolve. Routing begins with VISOR Stack/Table structures and descends through BIGFOOT BitWord, BitGroup, and Bit records as required. Temporal uses the CERBERUS TIME architecture. Semiotic uses BOSS, while SOLAR supplies lexical routes into the registered network. IMPLEMENTATION RULE The live registry tables are implementation surfaces. The reconstruction artifact defines responsibility and traversal; implementation may evolve without collapsing those boundaries. APPENDIX A - Implementation Source Map Current registry surfaces provided for DARTBOARD reconstruction and implementation navigation. A.1 Display - QUIVER / D/E/F/G Display root 🖥️: Open Airtable Display D 🖥️ D: Open Airtable Display E 🖥️ E: Open Airtable Display F 🖥️ F: Open Airtable Display G 🖥️ G: Open Airtable A.2 ARMORY 0000: Open Airtable XXXX: Open Airtable The wider ARMORY table sequence 00000, XXXXX, 000000, and XXXXXX remains architecturally applicable. For this reconstruction artifact, 0000 and XXXX are the primary demonstration surfaces because later tables are still being updated. A.3 Routing - VISOR and BIGFOOT VISOR Stack 🗃: Open Airtable VISOR Registry Table 🗄️: Open Airtable BIGFOOT Bit ▪︎: Open Airtable BIGFOOT BitGroup |▪︎▪︎|: Open Airtable BIGFOOT BitWord [▪︎|▪︎]: Open Airtable BIGFOOT BitWord Folder [▪︎|▪︎] 📁: Open Airtable A.4 Temporal Temporal resolution is supplied by the CERBERUS TIME architecture, including the 6×6 operational calendar projection, TIME-32/64/96/128 resolution ladder, Week and Phase identities, intercalary branch, clock/precision semantics, and Time Context boundary. DARTBOARD uses TIME when T is applicable; it does not reproduce TIME as a local calendar schema. A.5 Semiotic BOSS ⭐: Open Airtable BOSS supplies the governed Semiotic layer. SOLAR supplies lexical Names/Aliases and ingress routes into registered semantic territory; it remains outside the five-DART acronym. A.6 Document and Figure Source Basis Source Role in this artifact CERBERUS DARTS Architecture v0.1 Defines the five global projection domains, selective participation, authority preservation, surface convergence, and DARTBOARD as the bounded meeting surface. CERBERUS DARTBOARD - Semantic Kernel Runtime Interpretation & Interface Architecture v0.1 Defines the generic BitWord/BitGroup/Reader runtime, generated controls, governed mutation, and interface-as-projection boundary. CERBERUS DARTBOARD Formal Specification v0.1 Defines the broader operational surface, authority law, runtime direction, and the principle that DARTBOARD is not a truth store. CERBERUS TIME_DESCRIPTIVE-101 v0.1 Provides the canonical temporal specimen: TIME ownership of WHEN, 6×6 projection, intercalary isolation, BOSS/SOLAR separation, and D/E/F/G publication examples. DARTBOARD Pass 6 Figure Registry 18 approved Figure Contracts implemented as 18 Compound Constructs and 18 rendered publication artifacts. APPENDIX B - Figure Index The 18 approved Pass 6 Compound Constructs used by this Verified Release. Fig. Title Figure ID Compound ID Build 1 DARTBOARD runtime thesis DB-FG-001 DB-CC-001 Wave D 2 Five DARTS domain atlas DB-FG-002 DB-CC-002 Wave A 3 Selective DART profile DB-FG-003 DB-CC-003 Wave A 4 Anatomy of one DART DB-FG-004 DB-CC-004 Wave A 5 Target, Anchor, and Landing DB-FG-005 DB-CC-005 Wave A 6 Multiple DARTS, one manifestation DB-FG-006 DB-CC-006 Wave A 7 D/E/F/G Display coverage ladder DB-FG-007 DB-CC-007 Wave B 8 QUIVER-to-Display resolution DB-FG-008 DB-CC-008 Wave B 9 Routing descent DB-FG-009 DB-CC-009 Wave B 10 Optional ARMORY contribution DB-FG-010 DB-CC-010 Wave B 11 Optional Temporal contribution DB-FG-011 DB-CC-011 Wave C 12 TIME 6×6 calendar is a projection DB-FG-012 DB-CC-012 Wave C 13 Intercalary stress test DB-FG-013 DB-CC-013 Wave C 14 Semiotic resolution and SOLAR ingress DB-FG-014 DB-CC-014 Wave C 15 Four valid DART profiles DB-FG-015 DB-CC-015 Wave D 16 SK Reader as a specialized DARTBOARD path DB-FG-016 DB-CC-016 Wave D 17 Governed mutation and reprojection loop DB-FG-017 DB-CC-017 Wave D 18 Complete DARTBOARD ownership map DB-FG-018 DB-CC-018 Wave D Closing System Statement DARTBOARD DARTS describe the available projection domains. DARTBOARD selects the applicable contributions, resolves them around governed Targets, manifests them through registered Landings, and routes operations back to their owners. The Board may disappear; the canonical systems remain. Operational Compression DART Ask only when applicable D - Display What should be manifested, and at what D/E/F/G semantic coverage? A - ARMORY What accumulated personal or cybernetic context matters? R - Routing Where is the governed Target and how deeply must the route descend? T - Temporal Does WHEN matter, and what TIME resolution is sufficient? S - Semiotic What governed meaning, symbol, or conceptual context should accompany the Target? A conforming Board is the smallest complete composition for the task. It may use three DARTS, four DARTS, all five, or any other applicable subset. Its runtime geometry can change. Its source systems remain authoritative and rebuildable.